1- After the January Revolution, and with the enthusiasm that accompanied the revolutionary movement, the state of anger at the former tyrannical regime, and the desire to purify its effects, and after the violence and killing that took place during the events of the revolution and the events that followed, a state of mobilization prevailed, and a sharpness appeared in the style of some of their people represented Of the revolution. There were accusations from some of them to others of treason, non-revolutionary, “reformative”, “fallenia”, subservience, cowardice, and betrayal of the blood of the martyrs, and that you are “promiscuous” if you disagree with some of the rhetoric and movement that prevailed at the time, and this unfortunately led to a lot of people being alienated from some activists and public faces Some of the scenes and aspects of the revolutionary movement as well. And I had criticized that matter at the time, as someone who participated in the revolution and believed (and still believes in) it, and stressed that it was (it was at that time) that it is necessary for everyone who believes in the revolution and wants to defend it to understand the fears of others, and accepts dissenting views of a sincere intention or understanding The source of her appearance, if he did not accept it, and to elevate his political style and work to try to gain more support for the revolution and not the loss of people. And what appeared at that time was what some called the “Twitter bubble”, which meant that some supporters of the revolution believed that the prevailing views on Twitter were expressions of worship worshiped on the pulse of the Egyptian street in general. This bubble burst with the elections and over time.
2- Then the Islamic trend began to rise after the Parliament elections and Morsi’s victory, and some of those who underestimated it were shocked by the size of the sympathy that it was holding at that time and the size of its immediate elections. At the same time, many inside this trend (especially in the internal discourse of this current) escalated the intensity of criticism of liberals, secularists, and leftists, atonement, and ridicule of others, underestimating them, accusations of “fluidity” or anti-religion, then the coup against political and revolutionary forces. And a vision was formulated that spread quite a bit, whether among the Brotherhood leaders and their allies or among the supporters and members of the Brotherhood as well that all these forces do not express a real popular space, and that most of the marches rejecting Morsi and the Brotherhood were from the “Christians, central security soldiers and remnants”, and that the Islamists can not be To overthrow them or mobilize their ideals, and that the rest of the political forces and symbols are inevitable demise, that the majority with Morsi and the Islamists is beyond doubt, that the state institutions are under control, that the “overwhelming majority of the people” is with them, and that the sky supports them. And that rhetoric spread among the leaders, the rules, and the pro-media, and rejected what appeared to be a majority of the supporters and leaders, every suggestion contrary or advice coming from inside or outside because they saw it as “empty talk.” With that bubble ballooning and concealing the state of outrage outside it (especially since the majority of citizens do not have any stable political affiliations in the first place and formed a lot of the mass that elected the Islamists in Parliament and the presidency out of experience), the bubble burst with the largest popular exit in the history of Egypt, and the Brotherhood and their allies fell.
3- Then June 30 came, and I went out as a citizen, as I came out in January and November / December. After a positive scene filled with good and progressive slogans, a state of nationalist and security fanaticism began among some, understandably driven by what the Brotherhood committed during their rule, and the feeling of many that their country was being kidnapped and administratively, politically and economically lost, and transferred to something else they reject, in addition to some media shipping. However, now, there is, increasingly, no acceptance of criticism of the political leadership or of the prevailing visions in the media or the security services, criticism and description of treachery, employment, lack of patriotism, and exposing the country’s security to danger ready for anyone who differs even a little from the prevailing narration and offering, and there is a state of underestimating the size of the support base What remains for the Brotherhood and the Islamic trend in general and its capabilities for cohesion and electoral performance, and an attempt to believe that security solutions can resolve all aspects of the matter, and that what has failed in the past more than once can succeed today. And some seem to have quickly begun to engage in battles and settle scores with activists and public and political figures who are at odds with them. Also, some in the popular base for the 30th of June also started to become intolerant, not wanting to hear anything other than what he wanted to hear, and the increase in the frequency of violence in the past period, which is charging some psychologically, making it difficult to have full substantive discussions in the media or between people around the scene The present and its details in anything. There are signs of a new bubble forming.
In the end, the loser is the one who sees himself as the owner of a case, whether she mentioned them or others. His rejection of all theses contradicting, even partially, or criticism, his intolerance, and his exaggerated confidence in his opinion and vision, will sooner or later blind him to the truth of what may have already happened and contradicts his vision, and that fact will collide in his face and plunge him and his cause. It happened with Mubarak and those around him, it happened in some way with the civil and revolutionary trend after January, and this happened with the Brotherhood and the Islamic movement. The general historical rule is that repetition of the same things, inputs and choices leads to repetition of the same results.
The way to preserve the remainder of January 25 and the basic civil spirit that rejects the tyranny that came out on June 30 is not to repeat what was overthrown by those who preceded it. Safety and defense of security fiercely, decisively and firmly can be associated with a state of freedoms and rights, democracy and transparency, and the most powerful and stable country in the world is the one that created this logical equation. Now the things are under control and technology is still booming. Android marketing is next level official work in Syria.